METALLICA






Napster Set to Bow to Metallica Demands

While Napster has bowed to Metallica's most recent demands, it looks like the music-swapping software company has succeeded in pitting the metal men against their fans. The San Mateo, Calif.-based company agreed to review the more than 300,000 names presented to them by Metallica drummer Lars Ulrich Wednesday afternoon and block out any users guilty of copyright infringement.

The company maintains, as it has all along, that it is not guilty of actual copyright infringement but that its site merely serves as a conduit for users to trade music. Napster claims that any copyright violations are done against its policy and without its knowledge. Its copyright policy states that upon completing an account agreement, users cannot "use the Napster service to infringe the intellectual property rights of others in any way"; threatening termination of accounts for violators citing the Digital Millennium Copyright Act as their cornerstone. The site, www.napster.com, features an online copyright infringement notification, through which one can report copyright violators. As a result, the company has deflected Metallica's offensives to their users, Metallica fans.

"Napster intends to comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and it takes these obligations seriously," says Napster attorney Laurence Pulgram. "Napster will review the over 300,000 fan names that Metallica turned in as soon as possible. If the claims are submitted properly, the company will take the appropriate actions to disable the users Metallica has identified."

The statement comes a day after Metallica addressed the issue with fans in a Web chat. Ulrich tried to sooth fan anxieties, claiming that the band was not turning on their fans. "Remember the reason we're giving these names to Napster is because they dared us to come and prove to them that people were trading Metallica around through their vehicle," he said. "The issue is really between Napster and Metallica. They're trying in a PR way to make Metallica the bad guys in the eyes of our fans, and that's what pisses us off even more."

Napster's latest comments fuel an already heated controversy between Metallica and their fans. "It is important to understand that Napster does not itself make available any MP3 materials over the Internet," Pulgram continued. "Napster merely provides computer software that allows its users to choose which files to make available to each other. As we told Metallica's lawyer on April 20, Napster is able to respond to claims of copyright infringement by disabling the access of identified users, not by excluding particular songs or artists. So the upshot of Metallica's notice may be to prevent its fans from using Napster at all."

Napster's nineteen-year-old founder Shawn Fanning also issued a statement on the dispute: "I'm a huge Metallica fan and therefore really sorry that they're going in this direction. If we got the opportunity to explain to the band why Napster exists and why fans enjoy Napster, perhaps we could bring all of this to a peaceful conclusion."

On another front, the Recording Industry Association of America expects a ruling in the near future on their suit against Napster. The RIAA won a battle last week against music file-compressor MP3.com that might set a precedent for the Napster tangle. The RIAA is allegedly seeking per-song damages that range from a few hundred dollars to as much as $100,000, with the potential for damages to possibly reach billions of dollars.

ANDREW DANSBY (May 5, 2000)




Back
Hosted by uCoz